Taliban Leader Captured !!

By at 16 February, 2010, 11:31 pm

Suspect In Attempted Airplane Terror Bombing Arraigned In Detroit

Taliban: This originally means students; has become a synonym of terror. The Shariat law prevails in the reign of the Taliban. They forbid pork, wine, music, lobster, cameras, pool tables, masks, chess, nail polish and many other things.  Taliban laws were not only draconian and inhuman in nature but were found sometimes contrasting to Shariat. They encouraged the production of opium (for export reasons) but opposed the production and consumption of hasheesh or alcohol.

It is alleged that Pakistan was one of the major sponsor of Taliban. It had not only provided arms and finance to the same but had also provide them military equipment, recruiting assistance, training and tactical advice. However Pakistan had always denied such relations. Recently United States had threatened Pakistan that its financial aid would be ceased if it continued supporting Taliban.

Today Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, the group’s No. 2 leader behind Afghan Taliban founder Mullah Mohammad Omar, who is a close associate of Osama bin Laden, was captured in Karachi. His arrest is certainly the great victory for the Americans. The tussle between U.S.A and Taliban had gained momentum after the 9/11 attacks. Although the mastermind behind the attacks Osama Bin Laden was never caught, the United States had declared a war against terror. It is believed that his arrest would cease the Taliban operations for some time. America is grateful for the support of Pakistani intelligence agency but still believes that the same could be arrested much earlier. They believe that Pakistan had given covert support to Taliban Leaders in past. The U.S. warning and the situation faced in Swat valley are probably the reasons for I.S.I support to America. Taliban has denied the news by saying it’s a rumour spread by “foreigners”. Even if the same is true, the position is still unclear under which law would be Baradar tried. Whether he would be tried under the law of Pakistan or United States? In past Taliban leaders have been tried under the U.S. law probably the same would be done in this case too.

While it is proclaimed that Baradar confession may lead to arrest of other Taliban leaders. It is also true that his capture would not damage Taliban’s working. He was a member of Taliban Shura. He performed mainly political work. This would definitely affect the organization on psychological level but would not affect it in totality. Obaidullah Akhund, a leader of same stature was also caught in 2007 with the help of Pakistani agencies. The other reason which supports the argument is that in Afghanistan if a leader dies or is captured it is a setback to the whole tribe. Baradar belonged to Popalzai Durrani tribe (which was against Taliban).

Taliban has been a growing force which is becoming powerful day by day. They have their allies all over the world. They not only misguide youth on basis of religion but also buy children for these purposes. The youth is conditioned such that they become human bombs. It is manipulate the pious term  “Jihad” and transform it into “terror”.


Related Posts with Thumbnails
Categories : Politics | Social Issues | World

Comments
Siddharth Jain February 16, 2010

Very Well Managed Blog Meghna. Really Impressed.

I Am Not Being Driven By Passion For Nation But As The History Goes, Pakistan Has Always Based Her Politics On Hatred And More So Towards India.

As For Taliban, Their Endeavour To Impose The Ancient Customs In Modern World Will Do No Good. They Cant Turn Their Backs At The Rising Sun. But Then Might Is Right.

As For US, You Think She Is Any Less? Iraq And Afghanistan Are The Still Burning Examples Of Her High Handedness And “Democratic Autocracy” !!!!!

meghna February 16, 2010

Thank You so much.. I completely agree with you… In politics often its not the right and wrong which is supported but the interests of one’s nation. U.S.A supports Pakistan for its strategic position on the world map. One of the reasons why India supported Bangladesh was its own inherit interest in the establishment of the new nation. So is the case with any other country in the world.

Keshri February 17, 2010

Once again good one Meghna.

If you haven’t gone through these, spare some time and read it… I’m sure u will really like reading them…

Machiavelli’s “The Prince”
Huntington’s “The Clash of Civilizations”

meghna February 17, 2010

Thanks… I think your comments have always been one of the driving forces… Thanks for reading the posts and being a part of legaldrift. I’ll definitely read both of them soon. I’m sure I’ll learn a lot.

Leave a comment